Hi. I'm backing up to files on HDD and I've got the same issue. Bacula dir and sd (on FreeBSD-6.3) are 2.2.6, Windows fd was 2.0.3 and is now upgraded to 2.2.7.
When bextract'ing some old backups in FreeBSD, I see that all files are bigger than they're supposed to be. When running a restore-job from the same volume via bconsole, files are the right size. -- Silver On Friday 02 February 2007 01:41, Adam Myers wrote: > Any suggestions at all? > > _____ > > From: Adam Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:49 AM > To: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' > Subject: Different restore results: bconsole vs bextract > > > I'm seeing a strange issue that I haven't been able to find an answer for. > Without being long winded, restoring a fileset by using bconsole results in > success. If I try to do the exact restore but instead using bextract, most > of the files are restored correctly, but a number of them give a "bextract > Error: attribs.c:339 File size of restored file" message. The restored file > size seems to be larger than expected; and thus they are corrupt when I go > to use them. In searching the lists, the error is usually because the file > had changed in size while being backed up initially. But, I'm not sure that > is the case, if restoring from bconsole works. > > I'm at a loss, any ideas? > > Bacula 1.36.3 > Director - Fedora Linux 3 > SD - Solaris 5.8 > Tape Drive - Sun L9 DLT8000 (autoloader) > > Oh yeah, btape is successful. And the bextract line is: > /usr/local/bacula/bin/bextract -i /tmp/include-list -V EDM037 /dev/rmt/0cbn > /the_restore > > Thanks in advance, > - Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
