--- Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Foo Bar wrote:
>
> > Additional info: Bacula 2.2.6 on Debian 4.0, /mnt/bacula is mounted
> using
> > smbfs on a W2K3 NAS gateway.
>
> Why not put a bacula client directly on the NAS head?
Various reasons, chief amongst which support contracts. I see this as a
complication anyway, Samba does what I need without installing and
configuring an extra daemon.
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
