I used to have different names for full backups but I decided on a single pool for simplicity. It is easy enough to tell which volumes are used for full and incremental backups.
I meant for my last post to go to the list as well. Sincerely, -Michael On Nov 5, 2007 7:20 PM, Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That makes good sense. Do you also have a pool for inc/diff/full for > each client? Or just a single pool per client? > > Thanks! > > -Ben > > > On 11/5/07, Michael Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would suggest using a separate pool for each client, just because it > > makes volume management easier. For example, if I wanted to delete a > > client and all of it's data, I could just issue: rm client1-* > > > > Sincerely, > > -Michael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
