Hi,

25.10.2007 12:12,, Matthias Baake wrote::
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:10:06PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> your mail arrives here as an attachment, which makes it hard to 
>> reply... you might want to change that.
>>
> Sorry for that i hope this one comes correct.

Yup, now the reply worked as expected. Thanks!

>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>> I have actually a problem when a Backup Job fails. If it fails the
>>> predicted Volume gets marked as error. What i not understand is, if
>>> there is a connection problem between the fd and sd the volume is
>>> never used but still gets marked as error.
>> The important question is why it's marked as "Error". If the volume 
>> can't be read correctly, that is the expected behaviour.
>>
> The Volume is imho not the problem (File Storage at a local hard
> drive) . For example:
> The Job starts and the director is connecting to the fd. This
> connection times out because of Firewalling. So I think the Volume is
> never going to be touched. There is no connection made from the client
> to the storage daemon. For me this is a network error not a volume
> error. 

It looks like this, right. But still it would be good to see why 
Bacula marks a volume as "Error". There should be a line in the job 
report mail or Baculas console log.

>>> Is it possible to
>>> manipulate the error handling in case of a connection problem?
>> You can manually update the status of the volume to "Used" or "Full", 
>> but should first find out if the volume actually is usable.
>>
> I know but what i do not like is the manually ;). The problem is i
> have limited the maximum number of volumes on a specific storage
> device. If i get one error after another the volumes will end up all
> marked as error and the whole backup session is failing.

Well, Bacula marks a volume as "Error" when it decides it can't use 
that volume. While the logic in deciding this could be buggy, it's the 
only logic Bacula has :-)

So, from Baculas point of view, you can't automatically decide to set 
a volume to be usable again.

The next thing to do is to find out why the volumes are marked as 
"Error", I don't think you can avoid that task.

Arno


> Matthias
> 
>> Arno
>>
>>> Sincerly
>>
>> 24.10.2007 12:14,, Matthias Baake wrote::
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>>> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bacula-users mailing list
>>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>> -- 
>> Arno Lehmann
>> IT-Service Lehmann
>> www.its-lehmann.de
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 

-- 
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to