IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: > IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: >> hi all >> >> >> the emails usually are sent when nothing interesting is happening (my >> backups are all finished at night; the emails are sent somewhen during >> the day). >> >> however, receiving tracebacks gives me an uneasy feeling. >> >> any idea why they might occur? (ok, my information i give here is rather >> sparse, so i should ask: how should i investigate why they occur?) > > seems i forgot something crucial (at least i think it is important): > > all 3 affected daemons are running after that. > most likely they are not the same processes (PID) before the tracebacks, > but bacula is doing backups before and after the tracebacks occured > (and no backups are scheduled at the moment the traceback occurs). >
it turned out to be rather simple: after a good look at the headers of the traceback-emails, i noticed that they have not at all been sent from my backup machine, but from the machine where i did my initial tests (before deploying bacula). so the tracebacks where totally unrelated to my running backup-system, and instead might be related to my everyday updating and fuzzing around on the test machine... sorry for the noise fasd.r IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
