A full backup of the offending directory just ran in 7 hrs, 17 min with a rate of 160KB/s (1,416,688 files, 4.4GB SD bytes written). This is slightly more files and bytes than last month.
This is almost twice as fast as previous performance (13 hrs, 14 min and a rate of 86KB/s). This suggests that the upgrade to a newer version of bacula and/or the newer version of postgres made quite a difference. The backup continued to use the same disk for the catalog and the source of the files being backed up. Of course, this is still pretty bad. I'm asking on the ext3 list for ideas. Ross ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
