On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:09:08 -0500 "John Drescher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/28/07, MaxxAtWork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > when upgrading a bacula backup environment with many clients > > from which side is wiser to start? Clients or director/sd ? > > In other words which of these two situations is less likely to > > be troublesome: - old client talking with new director/sd > > - new client talking with old director/sd > > > I have not had any problems with the first one as I tend only to > update the director and this leaves the clients several versions > behind. > > John > > I'm currently doing the opposite. I'm setting up a new server. The new server has a newer version of fd than the backup server's director/sd. It seems to be working fine. -- Raquel ============================================================ Why has a religious turn of mind always a tendency to narrow and harden the heart? --Robert Burns ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
