Mike Ruskai wrote: > Since tape is a linear medium, and not random-access, the only plausible > way for what you suggest to work would be for Bacula to interleave data > blocks from two or more backup jobs.
Yes. > At a minimum, this would require > writing incredible amounts of data to the backend database to keep track > of which blocks on a given tape belong to which portions of a given file > from a given backup. I had imagined that each bacula block contained a header from which the job that it belonged to could be identified. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
