Hi, I have a Linux NFS fileserver which has to be backed up to a bacula server on another Linux box. The fileserver in question exports everything that's needed to be backed up so all files are actually accessible on bacula server via NFS as well. Should I run my backups via a remote bacula-fd client on the fileserver or via local client on the bacula box (reading from NFS-mounted tree), which method do you think will work with faster data transfers? I can try both and benchmark them of course but would appreciate if anyone done a similar setup already and can share experience.
Thanks, Ivan The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
