Hi Alan:

Thanks for your answer.  I think that I don't understand a lot backup 
system. I want to use one tape every day to have diferent versions of 
the same file (if the file changes in diferent days). But after your 
answer I'm thinking that one tape can save diferents versions of the 
same file. This is true?? I must supose that one tape can save diferents 
sessions while it have space. If this is true, I will use two tapes, one 
for full and one for every day.

Alan Brown escribió:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Afinat wrote:
>
>> I know that there is a lot of strategics... But which one you recomend?
>
> How many tapes do you have, how much data are you backing up each day 
> and what is the speed of your media?
>
> My strategy on our older single-tape systems(*) tends to be a full 
> backup on Tuesday nights, tape change on wednesday and incrementals 
> through the week, culminating in that full backup. Tapes are marked 
> with the date they're inserted and (especially important for DAT/DDS) 
> how many insertions they have had. We usually only keep DATs for 20 
> cycles due to reliability concerns.
>
> Tape changes on Monday or Friday are generally a bad idea - long 
> weekends wipe them out, which is why the fullbackup window is really 
> only available on Monday-Wednesday nights.
>
> Problems start when multiple tape changes are required during the 
> week. At some point it's worthwhile getting a small silo or other form 
> of changer.
>
> Given a fast enough connection there is no need for the backup 
> media/server to be in the same location as the filesystems being backed
> up - and several good reasons why they shouldn't be...
>
> For small backup systems and non-archival purposes, I'd be inclined to 
> use removable sata disk units in removeable enclosures such as 
> rhinocase devices instead of DDS/DAT. They're much better bang/buck 
> than anything smaller than LTO2 as long as they are properly looked 
> after and constantly monitored (smartd is your friend). Just remember 
> there are tiny moving parts inside them which don't like being knocked 
> around...
>
>
>
> * I would prefer to replace them with Bacula clients, but politics, 
> "ownership" and "control" get in the way. I suspect a lot of academic 
> sites have similar troubles.
>
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to