Onsdag 11 juli 2007 05:21 skrev Charles Sprickman: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Steen wrote: > > On Friday 06 July 2007 06:23:22 Charles Sprickman wrote: > >> What I'd like to do is the following: > >> > >> -Full backup each sunday, keeping the tapes for a year. After that I > >> would likely manually relabel all the tapes but one. These tapes would > >> all be in one pool. > >> > >> -Differential backup each following sunday, with 3 tapes that get > >> recycled each month. These tapes are also in their own pool. > >> > >> -Incrementals mon-fri, with 5 tapes that get recycled each week. Again, > >> in their own pool. > >> > >> Does this seem like a sane plan? > > > > I use almost the same pattern - but only diskbased > > I am running a test over about 20 machines right now, and I *think* I kind > of have this down after looking at the Volume Retention section a few more > times.. > > >> I'm on the fence about the differentials > > > > Don't really get that > > Never dealt with them before... But I do have a slightly unique(?) > situation. Most of the boxes are in another state, so I want to avoid > full backups when possible since they generally seem to need more than 12 > hours to run. So I figure instead of doing a full + incrementals each > week, I'll do one full per month plus a differential each weekend except > for the first to save some time/bandwidth. > > We don't (yet) have an autochanger or reliable remote hands at the > datacenter...
oh I see > >> as we very rarely go back to backups for anything... I'm also wondering > >> how these choices will impact the general ease of restoring something if > >> we need to. Again, I'm coming from Amanda, and there's not much > >> thinking there. When you restore, you just keep feeding it the tapes it > >> wants. > > > > Here it graps the disk volumes automatically - guess that would be > > identical to your experience with Amanda with tapes > > Good. I assume it's just going to spit out a message when the next tape > is needed. > > Another big question since the fact that catalog retention can be set in > various places. Do I need any retention settings in my client configs? I > see there are "File Retention" and "Job Retention" settings that can go in > a client config. Based on what's below do I need anything in my > individual client configs (or elsewhere) to make sure things get purged > out of the catalog properly? Yes - File & Job retention > > >> Here's what I've tentatively got in my bacula-dir config. > > I'm just going to add what I think I'm doing after each pool... > > >> pools: > >> > >> Pool { > >> Name = Monthly > >> Pool Type = Backup > >> Recycle = no # Bacula can automatically > >> recycle Volumes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired > >> volumes Volume Retention = 365 days # one year > >> Volume Use Duration = 23h > >> Maximum Volumes = 12 > >> LabelFormat = "Monthly" > >> } > > Don't ever recycle these, request a new tape each full run, keep info from > the fulls in the catalog for a year. Would there be any point to keeping > catalog on these fulls for longer or should I just rely on bscan to get > data off older full tapes? I don't keep mine because I don't think I will ever need them. If disaster strikes, I rely on Bscan > > I assume after a year, I will have to manually relabel(?) or purge these > tapes to use them again after I put one away for long term storage? You could also maybe have recycling and then copy the volumes after a year > > >> Pool { > >> Name = Weekly > >> Pool Type = Backup > >> Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically > >> recycle Volumes Recycle Oldest Volume = yes > >> AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes > >> Volume Retention = 1 month # one month > >> Volume Use Duration = 6 days > >> Maximum Volumes = 3 > >> LabelFormat = "Weekly" > >> } > > This is my differential, and I expect it to request a new tape each week. > It should keep info in the catalog for one month. It will automatically > recycle tapes each month, starting with the oldest volume. Do I have that > right? Seems so to me > > I'm also considering just using one tape/month for this. I would change > "Volume Use Duration" to 1 month to accomplish that, correct? Yes, providing enough space on the tape > > >> Pool { > >> Name = Daily > >> Pool Type = Backup > >> Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically > >> recycle Volumes Recycle Oldest Volume = yes > >> AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes > >> Volume Retention = 5 days # 5 days > >> Volume Use Duration = 23h > >> Maximum Volumes = 5 > >> LabelFormat = "Daily" > >> } > > These are the daily incrementals. I'm expecting these to do incrementals > based on the last differential, I don't think so - I think incremental is since the last backup whatever, and by the way differential is since the last full - so they will get bigger during the month - you may check the manual here. > and for Bacula to ask for a new tape each > day, with a max of 5 tapes. Each week the catalog will be purged of these > records. > > Again, I'm thinking I can change this to one tape for the week and I would > accomplish that by setting "Volume Use Duration" to 1 week, correct? > > >> Would it be simpler to let the incrementals all go to one tape and > >> reduce this to four tapes/month for those? > > > > Yes - no need to switch tapes > > I think that's a big advantage, as people are already annoyed with > Amanda's demand for a new tape each day. > > >> I'm using 100GB LTO-2 tapes, so I > >> certainly have more than enough room, but I suppose I open myself up to > >> problems if a tape fails... > > > > Yes - loose 5 days at most > > OK... > > >> Does the above config look fairly sane? > > > > To me - yes > > > :) > > Thanks, > > Charles > > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Bacula-users mailing list > >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > > > -- > > Regards > > > > Steen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Bacula-users mailing list > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- regards Steen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users