Hi! I'm just curious why was that "the best decision you made"?
-- Silver On Saturday 07 July 2007, Tim Schoellhammer wrote: > Hi Atom, > > I have done this a couple of weeks ago. > Please be carefuly about your database. The config is not the problem in > the config-files you need only change the path settings. > I have moved from FreeBSD 6.2 amd64 with Postgresql 8.2 to CentOS 5 with > Postgresql 8.1. > The only problem in that i jumped was the database version and the sql > statements in the dumpfiles. > I had to go manual in the dumpfiles an change a couple of lines. > Now i have a Bacula-System that go easy. For me it was the best decision > i made. Be carefully about a couple of rpms you wish to use > so i think lsscsi is a rpm you will find nice, and don't forget the mt > rpm and still the "normal" mtx rpm. > With the rpms from sourceforge (fschwarz / el5) from bacula you have to > have a very nice startup. > > So long blabla the only thing i would say be careful about you database! > > Tim > > > Atom Powers schrieb: > > I'm considering moving my bacula serve from a FreeBSD box to a CentOS > > one, in the hopes of getting better driver support for the hardware I'm > > using. > > > > What are the potential pitfalls? Is it realistic to expect to recover > > data from tapes written under FreeBSD? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
