On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote: > > > > > > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the > > > > packages. So I'm thinking about changing that and making only the > > > > pdf manuals (user and developer) actual sources in the RPM > > > > package. > > > > > > I see no reason for the source files to be in the packages for the > > > documentation. My suggestion: split the docs into source and > > > "binary". > > > > > To be a bit more explicit, the bacula-docs tarball we publish has > > actually been build before releasing it. I have always included that > > tarball as a source and then installed a few pieces. I'm suggesting to > > just install the pdf manuals and skip the html manual if that doesn't > > cause anyone grief. I think pdf is universal enough at this point. > > What about two tarballs? PDF. HTML. > > I stripped the docs tarball leaving only the html manual and the pdf ones. That reduced the size of the SRPM to 11 MB but sourceforge is still not cooperating. I've tried 3 times today to get the 2.1.18 release up and I keep getting aborted uploads. Perhaps it will work better tomorrow.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
