That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself, however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes. Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Times\ LT\ MM/..namedfork/ rsrc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 28020 Oct 14 2006 Times LT MM/..namedfork/rsrc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /tmp/bacula-restores/System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Times\ LT\ MM/..namedfork/rsrc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 14 2006 Times LT MM/..namedfork/rsrc - justin On May 4, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote: >> containing resource forks should work properly with either version of >> bacula that I have tested. What I am seeing however is that these >> files are listed with a size of zero in both bconsole (during setup >> of a restore job, by doing a "dir" during file selection) and also on >> the client after the restore is complete (the resultant files are >> zero kilobytes). > > The outer file may very well be zero bytes (that's the classic "data > fork"). Assuming your file is named "foo", do this: > > # ls -l foo/..namedfork/rsrc > > -- Jorj ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
