On 4/8/07, Shaun T. Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next, I'm seeing messages that bacula will not descend into other
> mounted partitions from root. Is that a change from the past or has it
> been silently not doing descending in the past and I really wasn't
> backing up those filesystems as I thought? Do I have to list them all
> in the fileset now, or is there a new directive I can put somewhere
> that will tell it do descend into them automatically?
I somewhat mis-spoke, it seems. I did have the other filesystems
listed in the fileset, so they were and are being backed up (I set it
up so long ago, I'd forgotten). What seems to be new, since 1.36, is
the messages saying it won't descend, which are, I assume, from when I
specify "/" in the fileset. It would, as someone wrote me, be nice if
those messages could be surpressed when the mentioned filesystems are
listed in the same fileset, but I guess I can ignore them.
--
-ste
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
