On Tuesday 13 March 2007 21:57, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I could be wrong, but I don't believe either one is implemented. :-P Do > I win? :)
Yes, you win. However, there is a new Enable mode in 2.0.0, which has an Archive status, which, if I remember well, prevents pruning. > > =R > > Jason King wrote: > > Not 100% sure, but archived volumes probably stay archived until their > > rentention period is up, then they would go into recycle which would > > then allow bacula to use them. Read-Only is set by the user and bacula > > will never change that attribute. > > > > Mike Seda wrote: > >> I have the same question: > >> > >> "Could someone tell me if there is a difference in the way that Bacula > >> handles volumes with the status "Archive" and the status "Read-Only"?" > >> > >> Did this ever get answered? > >> > >> Neal Gamradt wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> Could someone tell me if there is a difference in the way that Bacula > >>> handles volumes with the status "Archive" and the status "Read-Only"? > >>> Does any data get removed from the database with "Archive"? I have > >>> some files I want to pertinently archive on a volume that I am going > >>> to take out of rotation, but I don't want to remove them from the > >>> database, that way I can restore quickly if I need to. > >>> > >>> Also, does "Disabled" remove the information for that volume from the > >>> database? Thanks! > >>> > >>> Running Redhat Enterprise 4.0 with Bacula 1.38.11 and a Superloader 3 > >>> with an S4 tape drive. > >>> > >>> Neal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
