> That "400G with compression" is just an average.  There's no guarantee
> that you'll get 2x compression.  Personally, I find it false advertising,
> but nobody's listening to me.

2x compression is indeed unrealistic most of the time.

On a different note, some time ago I found myself wondering how
effective hardware compression is when compared to software compression
in the backup program, so I did some testing to see how much data from
the same fileset I could fit on the same tape with different settings.

The tests were done with a DDS3 tape (12GB native capacity) in a
Certance DAT72 drive. Sample fileset was about 25GB from a windows
machine, including the system disk (lots of binaries) and a 20GB
assortment of images (mainly compressed textures) and text files.

Tested compression settings were:
- hw compression, no sw compression
- hw compression, gzip -9 sw compression
- no hw compression, gzip -9 sw compression

Gzip compression was applied on a file-by-file basis, not by piping a
tar archive through gzip.

Results:
 - hw only: 16158925621 bytes
 - hw + gzip9: 17553548966 bytes
 - gzip9 only: 20472911550 bytes

Please note that these figures cannot be directly compared from a
compression ratio standpoint since they do not refer to the same data
(more bytes means more files were included), but they do certainly
provide a rough indication of the relative efficiency of the three
combinations.

Also note that DAT is old stuff: I don't really know how much better
hardware compression modern tape drives provide.

Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to