Oops; sent this wrong.
---

Huh, it didn't show up with option 2 (Search for a file):

   Enter Filename (no path):M.avi
   No results to list.

But it did with option 7:

   Enter full filename: /storage/M.avi
   Enter full filename:
   Bootstrap records written to /var/lib/bacula/restore.bsr

   The job will require the following Volumes:

      CND-015

   1 file selected to be restored.

which is nice, but doesn't really help me if I don't know the fully
qualified name of all files on a client. Maybe I'm entering the query
wrong in #2? (Oh, and there's no option 11, at least not in my
version.)

thanks again!

 -raph

On 2/7/07, Raphael Bouskila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huh, it didn't show up with option 2 (Search for a file):
>
>     Enter Filename (no path):M.avi
>     No results to list.
>
> But it did with option 7:
>
>     Enter full filename: /storage/M.avi
>     Enter full filename:
>     Bootstrap records written to /var/lib/bacula/restore.bsr
>
>     The job will require the following Volumes:
>
>        CND-015
>
>     1 file selected to be restored.
>
> which is nice, but doesn't really help me if I don't know the fully
> qualified name of all files on a client. Maybe I'm entering the query
> wrong in #2? (Oh, and there's no option 11, at least not in my
> version.)
>
> thanks again!
>
>  -raph
>
> On 2/7/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2/7/2007 2:32 PM, Raphael Bouskila wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'm having a really weird problem--not all of the files on my clients
> > > are being backed up. I'm not sure what's causing it, and in fact can't
> > > seem to see any pattern among what's being backed up and what's not.
> > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I could use a pointer!
> > >
> > > Here's what's actually on a sample client:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] storage]# ls -la
> > > total 36
> > > drwxrwxrwx   5 root     root  4096 Jan 30 14:50 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x  25 root     root  4096 Jan 26 16:40 ..
> > > drwx------   2 root     root 16384 Aug 19  2005 lost+found
> > > drwxr-xr-x   3 user1 cnd   4096 Jan 30 14:51 user1
> > > drwx------  15 user2    cnd   4096 Sep 22 17:00 user2
> > >
> > > Here's what I get on bacula on the server (doing a  "5: Select the
> > > most recent backup for a client" restore)
> > >
> > > $ dir
> > > drwxr-xr-x   3 user1 cnd         4096  2007-01-30 14:51:02 
> > > */storage/user1/
> > >
> > > I don't think this is a permissions problem, however, since on another 
> > > client:
> >
> > I think the last backup you selected was not a full one, but rather an
> > incremental or differential one.
> >
> > I suppose there simply weren't any changes to data in user2 since the
> > last backup of a higher level.
> >
> > You can use one of the other, more suitable, restore options. Probably
> > first use 2, 7, or 11 would help you.
> >
> > Arno
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] storage]# ls -la
> > > total 3473328
> > > drwxrwxrwx  4 root  root       4096 Oct 30 10:38 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x  3 root  root          0 Feb  7 08:23 ..
> > > drwx------  2 root  root      16384 Sep 12  2005 lost+found
> > > -rw-r--r--  1 user3  cnd     3267888 Oct 30 10:38 M.avi
> > > -rw-r--r--  1 root  root 3549913276 Jun 29  2006 tarfile.tgz
> > > drwxr-xr-x  8 user4 cnd        4096 Sep  8 11:24 user4
> > >
> > > $ dir
> > > ----------   0 root     root           0  1969-12-31 19:00:00  
> > > /storage/user4/
> > >
> > > so, even though there are read permissions to everyone on tarfile.tgz
> > > and M.avi, neither are being backed up.
> > >
> > > I'm using bacula 1.36, and otherwise am quite happy with my current
> > > setup, so unless this is a bacula 1.3x issue that can only be resolved
> > > by upgrading, I'd prefer not to go to 2 just yet.
> > >
> > > To be specific about my setup:
> > > Server:
> > > Debian sarge, kernel 2.6.8
> > > 1.36.2 (installed from the debian apt packages)
> > > HP Utrium 230 LTO 1 tape drive
> > >
> > > Clients:
> > > Fedora 4 and up, 2.6 kernels
> > > 1.38.11 (installed from the bacula-client rpm file for Fedora) on the 
> > > clients
> > >
> > > Any ideas would be much appreciated!
> > >
> > >  -raph
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
> > > easier.
> > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bacula-users mailing list
> > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> >
> > --
> > IT-Service Lehmann                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Arno Lehmann                  http://www.its-lehmann.de
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
> > easier.
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bacula-users mailing list
> > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> >
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to