-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 22:03, Thomas Glatthor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what have i to expect in the uname-column of the client-table?
>> the devel-docs describe it as "uname -a (yet unused)".
>> (unused by bacula, but maybe used by a user)
>>
>> uname -a on my workstation:
>> "Linux hostname 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Dec 20 14:51:19 EST 2006 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux"
>> uname's from my 1.38.11 clients:
>> Windows 2000,MVS,NT 5.0.2195
>> Windows Server 2003,MVS,NT 5.2.3790
>> i386-pc-solaris2.10,solaris,5.10
>> i686-pc-linux-gnu,redhat,8.0
>> i486-pc-linux-gnu,debian,testing/unstable
>> i686-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,Enterprise 3.0
>> sparc-sun-solaris2.10,solaris,5.10
>>
>> "fd-arch,os-name,os-version" ?
>>
>>
>> uname's from my 2.0.0 clients:
>> 2.0.0 (04Jan07) i486-pc-linux-gnu,debian,4.0
>> 2.0.0 (04Jan07) sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
>> 2.0.0 (04Jan07) Linux,Cross-compile,Win32 => win2003 server
>> 2.0.0 (04Jan07) Linux,Cross-compile,Win32 => win2k server
>>
>> "fd-version,xxxxx,xxxx" ???
>>
>> none of them looks like `uname -a`,
>
> No none of them are a uname -a. That is old documentation.
>
>> why is the win32-os-version lost?
>
> Yes, I hadn't noticed that since none of my Windows backups has failed for a
> long time, I never looked at it closely.
Somewhat more widespread than Windows I'm afraid. :-\ To be fair,
though, this was also a problem in 1.38.11 -- I never thought to report
it as a bug, since I understood it and was not widely using packages.
> Somehow that was lost during the conversion I imagine. I'll put it on my
> list
> of things to look at. The precise system info is far more important for
> support than where/how the program was compiled.
100% in agreement there.
>> maybe i want to do something with my clients depending on the os-version and
> platform or clients version ....
>>
>> (its nice to see the fd-version in the table, but on win32 i miss the
> os-version.
>
> As far as I am concerned the OS version is very important.
Glad to hear it -- see below:
> Thanks for pointing this out.
Something I'd like to add to this discussion... here is my client list:
ClientId: 1
Name: helios-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
ClientId: 2
Name: catalyst-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) i386-pc-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
ClientId: 3
Name: eiger-fd
Uname: sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
ClientId: 4
Name: sopris-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,
ClientId: 5
Name: kittatinny-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,
ClientId: 7
Name: lethe-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) i686-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,
ClientId: 8
Name: vistaadm-fd
Uname: sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
ClientId: 9
Name: katahdin-fd
Uname: 2.0.1 (12Jan07) i386-pc-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8
The only machine actually running Solaris 8 is eiger, however the
Blastwave.org/CSW package shows 2.8/5.8 as the version string since that
was the build architecture. catalyst and katahdin actually run 2.10/5.10
and helios and vistaadm run 2.9/5.9. In addition, the RedHat build (I
used contrib-fschwarz on the SF site) does not show a version number at
all, though both RHEL4 with 2.6.9 kernels. Funny, I was just going to
bring this up today (that the currently-running environment was probably
more useful than the build string).
- --
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFyQPamb+gadEcsb4RAtedAJ0W7E3CrG9mRtNDX0YDnBwkb/T/kQCfRm56
b8coxALNz6rcEgwRefljLGw=
=w6Fw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
