On Tuesday 09 January 2007 13:14, Jaime Ventura wrote: > Mikael Kermorgant wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to upgrade my installation of bacula but I have many clients. > > > > But is a 2.0 bacula director compatible with 1.38 file daemons ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > Mikael, > as you may read from the 2.0 releaseNotes file: > - You *should* be able to use 1.38.x FDs with version 2.0.0 Director > and SD providing you do not use any of the new features (runscript, > data encryption). It seems to work here, but we do not guarantee it. > - Your Director and SD must be simultaneously upgraded. > I've upgrade the dir and sd without problems > > I've upgraded the dir and sd, and everything seems to be working. > I'm now upgrading the fd's now.
I did the other way - upgraded my fd from 1.38.11 to 2.0.0, restarted it and everything backed up OK also :) Silver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
