On Thursday 04 January 2007 14:23, James Harper wrote: > Just a couple of typo's I noticed in the release notes. > > > - The MD5/SHA1 hash codes kept in the database are now kept in a > binary > > format compatible with the rest of the world. If you are running > verify > > jobs, you *must* do an InitCatalog or all files will show an MD5 > > difference. Also, authentication uses the new algorithm by > > default, but *should* accept connections from older components (FD) > > using > > the old non-compatible algorithm. This has been tested, but more > > more testing is still needed. > > Is the last line a typo or does it really require more more testing? > Does this refer to the Base64 implementation we discussed ages ago?
Yes > > > - Data encryption is now implemented and is documented in > > a new chapter of the manual at: > > http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_Data_Encryption.html > > I think that link should be: > http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Data_Encryption.html > Bacula_Data_Encryption.html doesn't seem to exist. A shame -- too late now. > > Thanks > > James > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
