On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kshatriya wrote: > The best solution would be to clone the files which are stored on disk to > tape...
Is really nobody using Cloned Pools and Jobs? :-( My current try is, to make a "Default" pool and a "Clone" pool. The Clone pool has the type Cloned. After that I created 2 jobs, a job "Client1" which writes to the default pool and a job "CloneClient1" which writes to the ClonePool and has an extra statement: Run = 'Client1 level=%l since=\'%s\'' Unfortunatly this seems to do nothing. When I start CloneClient1, a backup goes to the ClonePool, but Client1 job does not run - the jobs just seem to run independently from each other. Am I understanding something wrong in this concept, or am I doing something wrong? If I need to start jobs independently from each other, then what is the difference to just start 2 regular jobs who write things concurrently to 2 "regular" backup pools? Thanks! :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users