On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kshatriya wrote:

> The best solution would be to clone the files which are stored on disk to
> tape...

Is really nobody using Cloned Pools and Jobs? :-(

My current try is, to make a "Default" pool and a "Clone" pool. The Clone 
pool has the type Cloned.

After that I created 2 jobs, a job "Client1" which writes to the default 
pool and a job "CloneClient1" which writes to the ClonePool and has an 
extra statement:

       Run = 'Client1 level=%l since=\'%s\''

Unfortunatly this seems to do nothing. When I start CloneClient1, a backup 
goes to the ClonePool, but Client1 job does not run - the jobs just seem 
to run independently from each other.

Am I understanding something wrong in this concept, or am I doing 
something wrong?  If I need to start jobs independently from each other, 
then what is the difference to just start 2 regular jobs who write things 
concurrently to 2 "regular" backup pools?

Thanks! :-)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to