On Thursday 14 December 2006 10:26, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Will we have it on the next release (1.4)?
No, 1.40 is almost ready now. It will be later. > Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l. > Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880 > Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY > http://www.sonicle.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Da: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Data: 14 dicembre 2006 9.31.54 CET > Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Postgres slow because of autocommit > On Thursday 14 December 2006 01:27, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > > I forgot about the link I found about this: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-performance@postgresql.org/msg19584.html > > what do you think? > As I mentioned, this has nothing to do with the speed of writing on the tape. > It does slow down the overall speed, and if you are using the throughput > measures printed by Bacula, you are using the overall speed and not the speed > writing to the tape. That speed, if I am not mistaken, is printed in version > 1.39.x > The database speed up code has been working for PostgreSQL for a month or so, > and give very good speedup. However it will not be in Bacula until a later > version. > > Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l. > > Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880 > > Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY > > http://www.sonicle.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Da: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > A: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gabriele Bulfon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Data: 13 dicembre 2006 19.31.20 CET > > Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Postgres slow because of autocommit > > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 18:46, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > > > >> Moving the DB on another x86 / amd machine solve the problem, but I > > anyway > > > > can reach a maximum rate of 8-10Mb/sec, that is not the maximum transfer > > rate > > > > I may have on those LTO drives (that may run from 15 to 60 to 120 Mb/s > > > > depending on the version). > > > > > > > > Try moving your tape drive to a "modern AMD or x86 machine" :-) > > > > > > I'm inclined to believe that's not necessary. > > I was being a bit cute ... > > > My director machine is a > > > Sun UE450 3x296MHz, and the performance I get seems to be acceptable. My > > > example numbers are 1213K/s (including spooling), or 41 mins for 3GB > > > with a DAT72 drive. Is this slow? > > Not for a DAT, but it is horrible for any LTO particularly if it is an > LTO-3. > > > I use MySQL4 on my machine. > > > > > > -- > > > ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ > > > |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III > > > |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) > > > \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.| IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
