On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, 孙海成 wrote:
to Michael: Thank you . I tryed bacula-1.38.11 ,but the problem still there,I think maybe it is lack of some library ?
A segfault would not be the lack of a library; that would tend more toward a compilation failure. The runtime segfault may indicate a library incompatibility of some sort. I think there was a glibc change between RH8 and RH9, and there certainly has been on between RH8 and current releases. Unless someone else has some specific insight your best bet may be to debug with strace (or gdb?) to see just where the fault is.
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, 孙海成 wrote:when I'm working on get bacula-rescue run in my redhat 8.0. when i compile bacula-1.36.3 source ...1.36 is very old and you may not get any help on it. Have you tried the latest 1.38, or better 1.39, release? If you need stability, try 1.38.11 (or whatever the latest is); if you can tolerate a bit of change at release, try the latest 1.39.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
