> In answer to your question about packaging the regression tests:
>
> Once we release version 1.40 Kern is planning on moving from CVS to
> Subversion and changing the build process from "configure" based to CMake.
>
> At that time we will probably also switch to CMake's regression test
> framework.  It has built-in support for tracking the results of builds and
> tests.  All the information is made available through a web interface.  I
> haven't had time to play with it yet but it look really cool and quite
> useful.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh
> Fisher
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 8:27 AM
> To: Kern Sibbald
> Cc: bacula-users
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> 1. I have requested help setting up more community participation in
> testing,
>> bug fixing, and builds of more platforms such as Solaris, FreeBSD, ...
> This
>> is to ensure that all important platforms are supported better than I
> could
>> do alone.
>>
>
> Is it possible to package the regression scripts? Standardized
> regression scripts (if possible) along with a web based form or mailing
> list for posting the results of those tests would make it easier for
> users with various hardware/platforms to participate in the testing.
>
>> 2. I am working on setting up some "official" structure or structures
>> for
>> Bacula, possibly a Swiss Association, perhaps a Foundation.  This will
>> be
> so
>> that in the near term (1-6 months) Bacula will have a charter and a
> governing
>> board, and equally important, I plan to transfer the source and
> documentation
>> copyrights, which are currently held in my name into such a "permanent"
>> neutral entity.  I believe this will help ensure the health, and long
>> term
>
>> survival of Bacula as Free Software, as well as to ensure that the
>> project
> is
>> less (no longer) dependent on one person (me). Rest assured, this does
>> not
> at
>> all mean that I envision decreasing my participation with the project.
>>
>>
>
> When you investigated this previously there was some trouble contacting
> the FSF Europe. I take it you have now been in contact with them and
> they can at least help determine which Swiss structure is better for a
> structure that is going to own copyrights, yes?

Yes, I was able to meet with Georg Greve of FSF Europe.

> I am in total agreement
> with your reasoning, but the copyright ownership issues frighten me.
> Being a US citizen, I am conditioned to think of this as a major legal
> issue requiring legal council.

Transferring a copyright is rather trivial, but what are your concerns
about the copyright ownership?


>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>


Best regards, Kern

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to