On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:

> You might start by looking at the test named 
> 2drive-incremental-2tape, which does test multiple drive usage. 
> Also, I would recommend that you attempt to reproduce the problem 
> on a two drive autochanger, otherwise, I won't be able to use the 
> test unless you send me both the test and a four drive 
> autochanger.

I reconfigured for a two drive system.

> Even more ideal would be to duplicate the test using my 
> autochanger simulator, where you can have up to 10 drives.  For 
> example, see the test 2drive-incremental-2disk.  I suspect that 
> you should be able to reproduce it with this script, but it is an 
> autochanger simultor, so there are possible subtle differences.
>
> Another approach would be to demonstrate the problem on a 4 drive 
> tape autochanger, then modify it to use my simulator, and if that 
> shows the problem you can avoid sending me a four drive 
> autochanger, since I lack space to for installing it :-)

I ran 2drive-incremental-2tape tonight on my hardware and it failed 
with a 3903 error if I recall correctly.  I also ran the same test 
with 2drive-incremental-2disk and it ran successfully.

I've posted the failure of 2drive-incremental-2tape in the bug 
tracker.  I included the autoloader and drive configuration in the 
uploaded files as well as the ./tmp logfiles that seemed in any way 
important.  Now that I can easily run the tests I will be happy to 
run them again when you wish.  Thanks again; this must be close. :)

    -- Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to