On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Michael Brennen wrote:

> On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:08 pm, Sarath Jayewardena wrote:
> 
> > I am experimenting to see whether bacula would be a good system for me to
> > backup our department's servers. I am running bacula director and storage
> > daemon on a Debian (sarge) machine which has a scsi DLT tape drive
> > attached to it. The version of bacula is 1.36.2. It looks promising,
> > except for one annoying, and in my view, serious problem:
> 
> As a perhaps poor analogy, think of a bacula mounted medium as a mounted 
> filesystem.  You want to manually unmount a filesystem before taking it down. 
>  
> It isn't that the mount isn't recoverable if it gets out of sync, but things 
> work more cleanly that way.
> 
> >From what I've seen over the past few weeks, bacula is an excellent choice 
> >for 
> multi-system backup.  It does take some time to learn to admin it, but that 
> is part of why it is a good choice.
> 
> > The tape drive allows me to eject the tape by pressing an 'unload'
> > button. However, afterwards, when I re-insert the tape, bacula cannot read
> > it, so all the backup data is useless. (Of course, if I have 'unmounted'
> > the tape from within bconsole before  ejecting, bacula has no problem
> > accessing the data afterwards.) The question is, is there any way to make
> > bacula accept the tape if the tape was accidientally, 'improperly'
> > ejected?
> 
> In your described case it might well be as simple as mounting the drive with 
> bconsole if you manually eject/reinsert it.
> 
Thank you all you nice people offering help. This is really wonderfull.

Now Michael, I also agree with your analogy with a mounted filesystem. But
the problem is that even if I mounted with bconsole afterwards, it is
still blocked. Bacula is waiting for appendable media to do next backups.

> Kern has emphasized to me that in the 1.39.+ releases it will be more 
> important than ever to only make media changes with bconsole.  With an 
> autochanger that (nominally) locks closed, I find it easy enough to use 
> bconsole to manage media in the drives; that way I can manage it all running 
> gconsole from my linux desktop.
> 
> -- 
> 
>    -- Michael

I am just wondering, whether there shouldn't be a way to fix the problem
if something like the above happens.

- Sarath


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to