Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Thursday 31 August 2006 19:49, Marco wrote: >> Maybe that helps: > > Yes, I can now see what you are complaining about. I would like to see a > second Full save on version 1.38.11 to exclude the possibility that some > other process was hogging your machine. I would also like to see a Full > backup made on a version of Bacula older than 1.38.11, but made after > 28Jun06. I don't have full backups of the server but incremental of different days, all giving the same picture.
I tested a client, too. But I canceled it because it would have take quite a few days. The first report is from a version older than 1.38.11 and after 28Jun06. > However, perhaps your configuration changed. For example, perhaps you > turned on spooling for 1.38.11, which would probably slow things down a > lot. The fact that you are doing software compression would make the > backup rate extremely sensitive to other activity on the machine. I kept the config files byte by byte when I was downgrading. For both tests I created a new database even with the same script of version 1.38.11. There no extraordinary activities on that machine. /m ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
