Martin Simmons wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:08:28 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>> On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:33, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:29, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>>>> It's worth noting, that the messages above don't necessarily mean  
>>>>> that the
>>>>> filesystem mentioned wouln't be backed up at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> The message is generated, when a mounted filesystem is met, but the
>>>>> filesystem may be backed up anyway if it is specifically included  
>>>>> in the
>>>>> fileset configuration. The message just means, that the mounted  
>>>>> filesystem
>>>>> isn't backed up as a part of the parent directory's backup.
>>>>> Personally, I find this a little bit annoying.
>>> On Aug 13, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>>> Well the messages are there to warn the unwarry, but it would be  
>>>> nice if
>>>> someone would submit the code necessary to do a "forward and  
>>>> backward" look
>>>> through the filesets to see if the filesystem has been specified  
>>>> directly
>>>> somewhere else so that the message could be suppressed.
>>> Or how about an option to disable these messages in the Message  
>>> section?  Trust me when I say that we always backup all we care to.    
>>> I never want to see these messages (and have it fact disabled them  
>>> for us by editing the source, which isn't all that portable).
>> I am not much in favor of an option to disable these messages -- possibly we 
>> could put them into a separate message class, but this is getting to be a 
>> bit 
>> overkill, and previous user comments on this list were not too favorable to 
>> that idea.
>>
>> I have modified the messages to include the directory from which the 
>> filesystem change is not permitted, which gives the user a bit more 
>> information about what is going on.
>>
>> I think the simplest and best solution is to suppress these messages as I 
>> wrote above if they are in fact backed up somewhere else in the backup.  
>> This 
>> will ensure that the messages are printed only if there is a danger that the 
>> user is missing a partition, but it will also require someone to write some 
>> code (well, any solution will).  If it bothers you enough and you would like 
>> it fixed, you might try coming up with this kind of code.  
> 
> Another workaround is to list the mounted filesystems in an Exclude option.
> 
> __Martin

This doesn't work on 1.38.6 the messages are still printed.

--
Robert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to