On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:57:23PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 18:09, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > ----- Forwarded message from Bacula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> > ...(clipped)...
> >   Storage:                "Disk_localnet"
> >   Scheduled time:         18-Aug-2006 23:21:46
> >   Start time:             18-Aug-2006 23:21:57
> >   End time:               19-Aug-2006 05:33:18
> >   Priority:               10
> >   FD Files Written:       315,575
> >   SD Files Written:       315,575
> >   FD Bytes Written:       357,928,460,316
> >   SD Bytes Written:       182,535,116,638
> > ...(clipped)...
> > 
> > 182gb instead of 357gb.  The only change I made was to enable sparse file
> > support so this is likely, but I wanted to confirm.
> > 
> > The FD bytes being large is also why Estimate shows the wrong answer when
> > sparse file support is enabled?
> 
> Because it is an "estimate" as the name implies.  It takes the size of the 
> file as recorded in the stat packet and doesn't read the whole file and apply 
> the sparse algorithm.
 
But this is expected behavior, right?  It looks correct?

-- 
Jo Rhett
senior geek
SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to