Help! Bacula is unable to use one of the two drives in our LTO2 (Dell 
Powervault 132) autochanger.



I've been fine-tuning my bacula config, and went from having all backups going 
to a default pool to separate pools for incrementals, full, and archive backups.

Previously, backups worked fine with the autochanger, writing to both tape 
drives at once.

I haven't made any changes to the "Storage" resource in the bacula-dir.conf, or 
to the bacula-sd.conf at all. Only the Job definitions, Pools, and Schedules 
were changed in the bacula-dir file.

I do not believe that this is a configuration issue, just that bacula is 
confused about whether it's got control over Drive-1, and that bacula needs to 
have it's idea of the status of that device reset.

Backups are working, but only to a single drive. The "status storage" command 
produces the following:


-------------------
Device status:
Autochanger "pv132t" with devices:
   "Drive-0" (/dev/tape0)
   "Drive-1" (/dev/tape1)
Device "Drive-0" (/dev/tape0) is mounted with Volume="000062" Pool="Incremental"
    Slot 3 is loaded in drive 0.
    Total Bytes=433,027,038,315 Blocks=6,712,350 Bytes/block=64,511
    Positioned at File=433 Block=851
Device "Drive-1" (/dev/tape1) is not open or does not exist.
    Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted.
    Drive 1 is not loaded.
-------------------


I've tried loading a new tape into drive 1 (via mtx, outside of bacula), but 
any attempt to get bacula to recognize the tape (update slots, mount, 
umount) seems to hang at "Contacting storage director".

Currently, there are 8 backups running, writing (slowly!) to the same drive.

Environment:
        bacula-sd, bacula-dir 1.38.9 on the same server (Linux 2.4.26)
        bacula-fd 1.38.9 on various servers


[1] Is there any way to force bacula to recoginize the 2nd drive without 
    interrupting the current backups?

[2] Will restarting bacula-sd interrupt the current backups (will they be
    resumed at the same point)?

I'd appreciate any answers as quickly as possible, as there is about 4TB of 
data being written very slowly, one tape at a time...when it could be using 
both devices.


(By the way, I tried searching the archives on sourceforge before posting, but
that returns the message "Permission Denied. Searching of non-projects is not
allowed.") 

Thanks,

Mark

----
Mark Bergman                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator
Section of Biomedical Image Analysis             215-662-7310
Department of Radiology,           University of Pennsylvania

http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?search=mark.bergman%40.uphs.upenn.edu



The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, 
and delete the original message.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to