On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 08:12:28AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > FYI: About 10 minutes ago, I posted a test message to the list from a > Mutt client. My mail server logs verify that the message was > received by sourceforge:
I've run into this problem as well. It seems that Mailman has a spam-avoidance measure that trys to send a delivery status request to the originating MTA as determined by reading the "Received:" headers in the message. I'd guess that you have mutt delivering to sendmail on your workstation, and that sendmail is configured to listen only on localhost, and to relay outbound mail through a mail host at your ISP. In this configuration, Mailman fails to get a DSN acknowledgment from [EMAIL PROTECTED], and drops your mail on the assumption that you're a spamming evil-doer. This explains why mail is accepted when sent with a different mail client: pretty much every mail client other than mutt delivers directly to a dedicated mail host that will accept DSN requests. You can work around this problem by configuring mutt to deliver through a program such as msmtp, which relays without adding the standard-mandated "Recieved:" headers. $ head .muttrc my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] set sendmail="/usr/local/bin/msmtp \ --host=smtp.comcast.net \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- John Kodis. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users