On 22 Jul 2006 at 4:36, Dave wrote: > I've implemented tls connections with a bacula 1.38.11 server and Unix > clients, all worked well. My problem is i've discovered winbacula v1.38.10 > does not support tls, so i've pretty much just locked out four machines. The > issue i believe is between the windows file daemon and the storage daemon, > the director can talk to this box, i don't have any tls directives for the > director and this machine, but the storage daemon requires tls. My question > is is it possible for machines that can speak tls to do so, while allowing > others, that can not to still function unencrypted?
Have you considered "TLS Enable = Yes" on the SD not "TLS Require = Yes". As mentioned in another thread, I am quite sure that TLS is not implemented in WinBacula. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
