On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > 3. Currently the manual is licensed under a somewhat restrictive license > that does not permit commercial reproduction of the manual without > explicit authorization. This means that the manual does not mean the > definition of Free Software. My idea in keeping the license commercially > restricted was so that someone could possibly publish the manual (or use > it as the basis of something to be published) and that a part of the > revenues would revert to the project. > > However, I am now convinced that there is little chance that someone would > want to publish the manual without working with us and that it is better > to change the license to GPL version 2. There are, of course, all sorts > of other open source licenses, but given that the source is GPL v2, this > is the logical license for the manual as well. > > Comments?
Thanks for reconsidering. This will allow the documentation to be shipped with Debian again. Kindly Christoph _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
