On 5/26/06, Heigl Florian - Munich-MR - external <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A 11.00 client might work, but You shouldn't expect it to be easy. > It is on my list to retry it when I have some more understanding of > all the weird stuff linkers do, but on the other hand... 11.00 has it's > EOL > in less than a year - so it's not a production priority issue :p > I'm still conserving a 11.00 and 10.20 host, if You want to put some > effort into a 11.00 client, I'll be in. >
Hello Florian, I knew about your recently released binaries for 11.11 (BTW: thanks for that!). About my case: after updating the compiler to gcc 3.3.2 I was able to get my client (apparently) working on 11.00. Today I'll do some backup&restore tests. As I wrote in my first mail, I won't go in production with that, it's mostly to test the general functionality of the backup system, practice backup operation & maintenance, etc. In my HP-UX environment I should not have large files or ACLs, so probably I won't hit those limitations. Anyway, what happens in that case, does bacula (dir or fd) complain, it just silently backups a corrupted/unrestorable file or what else? Cheers -- Maxx _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
