Bill Moran wrote: >Marcus Hallberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Now has the director reported as failed it took two hours. >> >>The final output from the director is: >> >>26-May 14:06 edstrom-fd: edstrom.2006-05-22_10.07.42 Fatal error: >>c:\cygwin\home\kern\bacula\k\src\win32\filed\../../filed/backup.c:500 Network >>send error to SD. ERR=Input/output error >>26-May 14:06 edstrom-fd: edstrom.2006-05-22_10.07.42 Error: >>c:\cygwin\home\kern\bacula\k\src\win32\lib\../../lib/bnet.c:393 Write error >>sending len to Storage daemon:localhost:9103: ERR=Input/output error >>26-May 16:05 neo-dir: edstrom.2006-05-22_10.07.42 Fatal error: Network error >>with FD during Backup: ERR=Connection reset by peer >> >> > >[snip] > > > >>The "Network error with FD during Backup:" does that indicate that there >>is a problem for the director to talk to the filedaemon or for the >>filedaemon to talk to the storagedaemon? >> >> > >Looks to be between the FD and the SD. Sure you don't have any firewalls >or other traffic control equipment between the two that's interfering with >the FD reliably contacting the SD? > > > There is no firewall blocking the communication between the bacula units and it worked fine for five days... It has broken twice on what could be the same place.
I started a new fullbackup wich should be at this place in a couple of days so if it breaks on the same place then I will know that it is not network related. /marcus _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
