Hello Thorsten, > I try to reproduce the problem you have. As the win32 fd changed a lot for > being Unicode, VSS and 32K path length enabled, the code lines increased. > Let me try to narrow your problem: > > Do you have *many* files? (if this causes problems, it may lie within > unicode, 32K code) > Or > Do you have *large* files? (if this causes significant speed problems, it > may lie within VSS. Did you enable VSS support? Can you see differences > between enabled/disabled?)
I did not enable VSS for the backups (should I?) and VSS only works for Win 2003 Server and Win XP, not Win 2000 server correct? The Win 2000 Server is a MS SQL Server and I have a few large files to backup. The Win 2003 Server is an Intersystems Cache Database server and it too has a few large files to backup. > Can you please check the cpu load during backup and during "estimate"? > With old fd in comparison to new fd? I will check and see what the CPU does during the backup. > The transfer rate alone doesn't say very much about the fd performance, I > had 86,0 KB/s right now with 200.000 files checked, but only 2000 backed > up... Right, but when I hit the large files, I see a spike in the transfer rate with the 1.37.32 client - but with the 1.38.[8|9] client I see a reduction in transfer rate. I did a -d 200 on the 1.38.8 client on the win 2000 server if you want to take a look at the trace file. Thank you, Tom. ---- Thomas J. Boyda Consultant 276-739-2314 (Desk) ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
