> So what I'm suggesting is that we submit some of our own configs (with > relevant secure data excluded) to the website so that they can build up > a good list of configurations for people to use. > > What do people think? Would they find this beneficial. > I think there are some examples in the manual, but in my opinion this idea sounds excellent. Maybe this could be discussed as a part of a bigger project: how to develop Bacula's documentation in general? Currently, there is very much very precise and up-to-date information in the manual, but it is getting more and more difficult to find the correct piece of information from that manual -unless you don't exactly know beforehand, what you are looking for :-(
Anyway, there needs to be sufficient explanation of the example confs too, a conf file alone is not of big help yet. Each conf (or a piece of conf) should be well-commented, either within the conf file or in a separate explanation. And absolutely not huge amount of alternate commented-out configurations (that maybe were tried some day) in the examples. Regards, Timo ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
