> No, that would not work very well.  The solution, which you seem to
imply
> below is simply to send a different initial Hello "signon" that
contains
> all
> the necessary information, plus the ability to extend it to different
> hashes
> in the future.  The new handshake can be easily distinguished from the
> old.

There's probably an easy answer to this question, but what would be the
response to a downlevel (say, 1.38.x) file daemon to a new level
'Hello'? Maybe any extra stuff on the Hello would be ignored by the
downlevel client (which would just respond as normal) but noticed by a
new one which would respond appropriately...

James


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to