This is what you said Troy Daniels
> Scott,
>
> I noticed you stated you changed your bootstrap file after selecting the
> file to be restored.
>
> By any chance did you change it to the one created during the backup
> process?
>
> If so, as I understand it (And I could be wrong) you just told the
> system to restore all the files recorded in that file.
>
> The selection mode should build it's own bootstrap file, containing only
> the file you asked for. (You should see a message to this effect once
> you enter 'done' I believe).
>
> Try it without changing the bootstrap file and see if it makes a
> difference.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Troy Daniels
> Systems Administrator
> iTouch Australia PTY LTD
>
> "We have so much time, and so little to do! Strike that, reverse it."
>       -- Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.
>
>
>
> Scott Ruckh wrote:
>> This is what you said Scott Ruckh
>>> I am trying a restore for the very first time, so this may just be user
>>> error, but I got strange results when trying to restore a single file
>>> to a
>>> Windows XP client.
>>>
>>> I ran the WX-Console program from the target machine (Windows XP).  I
>>> went
>>> into restore mode and I marked a single file for restore from the root
>>> of
>>> the C:\ drive.  If I ran lsmark the correct file was returned.  If I
>>> ran
>>> ls the directory was displayed and the single file was prefixed with an
>>> "*".  I ran the count command and the response was that 1 file is
>>> selected
>>> for restore.  All of this looks correct to me so I issue the done
>>> command.
>>>
>>> The restore job needs to be modified so I change the Bootstrap file,
>>> the
>>> client name, Where = / (to put back the file where it came from) etc,
>>> until job parameters look correct.  I then launch the job.
>>>
>>> The restore kicks off and the file I selected is restored with no
>>> problem.
>>>  Seems good, right?  Well here is the kicker:  Unfortunately the
>>> restore
>>> continues going through the entire FileSet.  I can not tell if the job
>>> is
>>> just reading files, or if it is actually restoring files.  Whatever the
>>> case may be, I do not understand why this would happen.  Once the
>>> single
>>> file was restored I would have thought the job would have completed
>>> sucessfully.  I have yet to let the job run all the way through because
>>> it
>>> scares me that all the files keep scrolling on the console and the
>>> Storage
>>> Device is continuosly active.  I am almost certain it was restoring the
>>> other files based on events that happened during the restore, though I
>>> do
>>> not have valid proof and I am too nervous to test.
>>>
>>> Is this normal?  Is this user error?  Is this a bug?  Anyone know what
>>> is
>>> going on?
>>
>>
>> I went ahead and tested because I thought the damage was already done.
>> In
>> fact I did the same restore from the director's console just to see if
>> it
>> made a difference.  The results from the director's console were exactly
>> the same as the target's console.  Also, I proved other files are
>> definitely getting restored even after only 1 file was marked for
>> restoration.
>>
>> I am using disk as my storage device in case it makes a difference.
>>
>> I am almost certain I am using the correct settings for the restore job,
>> so I have no idea what is going on.
>>
>> Anyone have any idea what is going on?
>>

There you have it!!  Prime example of user error.  I obviously did not
understand the .bsr file.  I will re-read the documentation in the restore
section of the users manual because I do not remember the bsr's usage
being discussed.

I have only been using bacula for a few days, so I am learning new stuff
every day.

Thanks for the response and the solution!

Scott


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to