Hi,
On 4/26/2006 6:35 AM, Scott Ruckh wrote:
This is what you said Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
wrote:
I was already using those options in my schedule. It looks like you are
saying to add the other pool options for each RUN statement. I had not
tried this. Are you already using this, and is it working?
Yes, I'm using this. It's working fine for automatically scheduled jobs.
You still have to be careful if you - for example - manually start an
incremental backup which gets propagated into a full one - then none
of these configuration settings will be consulted, and you must take
care to manually adjust pool, storage etc.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Now that I think about it, the Pool is not my problem, but rather the
storage. The FULL-Pool was chosen, but it wrote it to the INCREMENTAL
Storage Device rather then then the FULL storage device.
Am I getting confused? I do not believe your suggestions will resolve my
issue.
I think Wolfgang got confused :-)
I am running a manual FULL right now to get a FULL backup before the
Incremental schedule kicks off which I think will fix everything. It
would be nice that this would work automatically when a new client is
added and the first backup is run.
If I am not correct in my thinking, let me know.
I think you're right... a setting like FullStorage, DifferentialStorage
and IncrementalStorage would be one good solution, but some time ago
this was discussed and Kern said he didn't see the need for it. As
nobody else implemented it, it's a feature still missing.
I hope that in the future the python interfce grows to allow all these
settings.
By the way: I even think that, once you can set all these things via
python events, the configuration of Bacula can be much simplified
because you're not foreced to use the flat text configuration files.
Instead it could be possible to to store almost all configuration
(except for some job stubs) in a way accessible by python and set the
jobs up from there. Having all the important settings in a database, for
example, would allow things like dynamically determining backup levels,
storage devices to use, file sets and so on. Very interesting IMO. Might
be a project for someone :-)
Arno
Thanks.
Scott
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
