Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 24 March 2006 15:49, Rene Brask Sørensen wrote:
Rene Brask Sørensen wrote:
The 1.38.5 and older versions of bextract on a Unix/Linux machine cannot read Win32 data.

However, if I am not mistaken, the 1.39.6 (development code) of bextract does read Win32 data. This is still experimental. You will need to build this code, but you don't necessarily need to install it -- just run it from the build directory, and I am definitely not suggesting an upgrade at this point !

If for some strange reason, bextract doesn't read Win32 data, you can use the normal Bacula 1.39.6, which I am sure does restore Win32 data onto Unix/Win32 machines. Again, this is still experimental.

However, I'm not 100% sure what will happen if you have backslashes in the path data as I doubt that this case was ever tested.


Hi Kern

Thanks for your directions. I'm trying to checkout version 1.39.6 from your cvs repo but I can't find it. The newest one I can find is 1.38.6. Am I doing something wrong ?

Best regards

René


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to