I have installed debian packages downloaded from sourceforge (Bacula
1.36.3-2), which have been packed by the same maintainer of
1.36.2-2Sarge1, and I have still another index table:

+-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation
| Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment |
+-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
| File  |          0 | PRIMARY  |            1 | FileId      | A
 |      550866 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
| File  |          1 | JobId    |            1 | JobId       | A
 |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
| File  |          1 | JobId    |            2 | PathId      | A
 |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
| File  |          1 | JobId    |            3 | FilenameId  | A
 |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
+-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

P.S. I apologize for the very bad quoting, but couldn't find a better form.

cheers,
Carlo - a brand new Bacula user

Gavin Conway ha scritto lo scorso 22/03/2006 10:36:
> Hi Kern,
> 
> I did notice the difference when looking at the two installs I have
> here. Here is the output from the two;
> 
> Debian Sarge 3.1 Bacula 1.36.2 (installed from the debian stable tree)
> 
> +-------+------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> | Table | Non_unique | Key_name   | Seq_in_index | Column_name |
> Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment |
> +-------+------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> | File  |          0 | PRIMARY    |            1 | FileId      |
> A         |    26781364 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | FilenameId |            1 | FilenameId  |
> A         |      653204 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | FilenameId |            2 | PathId      |
> A         |      686701 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> +-------+------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> 
> 
> Debian Sarge 3.1 Bacula 1.38.5 (installed from source)
> 
> +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation
> | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment |
> +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> | File  |          0 | PRIMARY  |            1 | FileId      | A        
> |           0 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | JobId    |            1 | JobId       | A        
> |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | JobId_2  |            1 | JobId       | A        
> |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | JobId_2  |            2 | PathId      | A        
> |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> | File  |          1 | JobId_2  |            3 | FilenameId  | A        
> |        NULL |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |
> +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+
> 
> 
> 
> Can anyone else running Debian Sarge 3.1 and the package in the debian
> stable tree confirm my findings? If they can then I'm quite concerned
> that this installation will have been deployed to clients.  Is there an
> easy way to add the missing indexes to the default install?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin Conway
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to