On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:01:47PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> If you are still interested in this subject, I would make the following 
> comments:

I'm still interested, this is actually pretty high on my list of things
to try.

> 
> - I don't know what the COPY command is, but I doubt it is something Bacula 
> would want to use since I like to keep the code simple and as uniform as 
> possible across systems.

I understand this and (mostly) agree with you on it.

> - As you noted, there is some transaction code in Bacula.  However, it is 
> turned off for the reasons that Martin mentions.
> 
> - On the other hand, I have come up with an idea that I have discussed with 
> Dan (possibly off-list) for implementing transactions in a slightly different 
> way from before.  This would IMO permit a significant improvement in speed 
> inserting the file attributes. If this interests you and you have not seen 
> those emails, please let me know, and I'll see if I can dig them out -- if I 
> don't have them (because I was not using my normal email), I'm sure Dan does.

I don't think I have seen them, I have some ideas too, but I did not
want to air them until I had been through the code enough to know what I
was talking about.

-- 
Karl Hakimian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to