I'm noticing a lengthy pause in an rsnapshot setup when the directories being shuffled are over 3gb or so. Rsnapshot makes a copy of the last backup to a new name then runs rsync against the original. Making that copy can take awhile. And more so as it gets bigger.
I'm not stating a flame war I hope, but: I wondered if the method bacula uses to do incremental backups is faster by virtue of the methodology? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
