>>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:18:01 -0500, "Brian A. Seklecki" <[EMAIL
>>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 22:10 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > >=20
> > > In many cases (i.e. when, during the mv operation, to time stamp of the=
> =20
> > > testfile inode was modified) /dir1/testfile will not be stored because=20
> > > it's not recognized as new - it's time stamps are older than the last=20
> > > full backup.
> >=20
> > AAAARGHHH!!!! It was exactly reasons like this one that made me
> > switch from my home-grown tar scripts to a professional backup
>
> Not to be curt, dotty, or any of that, but if If we could please move
> the discussion back to "Testing and Simulation of the Scheduler", as
> well as:
>
> - Testing of Retention Times
> - Testing of Recycling/Pruning
> - Testing of automatic promotion of {Increm/Diferer}ential to Full...
>
> How often does the Director poll the system date time? How often does
> the Storage director? I don't see any options in the config to control
> this. Specifically, for periodic maintenance like
> recycling/pruning/volume status flagging.
AFAIK, these maintenance operations are never run on their own. They are
always triggered by other operations such as a job running or 'status dir'
when Bacula needs to decide which volume to use.
__Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
