On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Frank Sweetser wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:17:09AM -0800, Kel Raywood wrote:
I think that the archive is intended to be used in cases of a complete
disaster of the backup system. i.e. the catalog is lost and you have
to rebuild it from the archive tapes. In that case, I can think of a
couple of reasons why it would be useful to have archive records removed
from the catalog.
(a) So that the next partial backup (incremental/differential) is not
affected by the archive. ie. regular backups proceed normally.
(b) A normal restore to a client would come from the backup tapes which
are presumed more easily accessible than archive tapes which might be
taken offsite.
Very slick! Any chance I could convince you to do a slightly more
detailed writeup on the wiki? =)
http://paramount.ind.wpi.edu/wiki/doku.php?id=sample_configs
Sorry for the delayed response. I haven't had much time this week to
keep up with the mailing list. I'll try and find some time in the next
few weeks for a more detailed description of using a seconda catalog for
archiving.
Kel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
