Kern Sibbald wrote: > > There seems to be some problem here, because the rescue rpm > should load a copy of the rescue directory that "knows" that > it was installed by an rpm and hence it should pick up the > static bacula FD that was installed with your normal rpm. > Apparently it is not doing this. By following the scripts you > may be able to resolve the problem yourself -- in any case, I'll > try to look at this in the next couple of days. > > In any case, you should be using > > make all > > rather than .make all > > The make procedure is looking for a file rpm-install (if I > remember right), which is the signal to take the installed > static-bacula.
FYI, when I tried to do the "make all" from the 1.38.2 RPM on RHEL4, the process kept looping on this line because /home/kern obviously doesn't exist on my system: if test ! -f ../rpm_release ; then \ ./make_static_bacula /home/kern/bacula/k ; \ fi Rather than trying to re-create /home/kern/bacula/k blindly, :-) I just did a "touch rpm_release" in /etc/bacula/rescue/linux/cdrom and then did my "make all". It finished building the .ISO, but I haven't burned the results or tested it yet. Just figured that I'd give the packagers a heads-up for the problem that at least one other person reported in the archives, in case this wasn't fixed in the upcoming 1.38.3 build... -Arthur ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
