On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:04:40AM +0100, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Maybe I am wrong, but as I'm having the same problem for months, I deduce > there is something wrong on the Bacula pdf document: it states that bacula > will consider the shortest retention period during prune. > So, I guessed from the beginning that shortening the Volume Retention Period > would force bacula to purge jobs and files even though they have a longer > retention period.
I thought I was sure about this but then I read http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html again and now I'm not so sure anymore. -- Sebastian Stark -- http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/~stark Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
