On Friday 25 November 2005 15:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I tried to install a bacula-portgress rpm,
> but it complains about missing this library.
> I have version .4 instead.
> Have tried to make a libpg.so.3 softlink.
>
> If I try to install from the sources,
> will it then be able to use my newer version of the postgress libraries??
Yes.
>
> - or is it better to find som older version of Postgress?
If you want to install from rpm.
You can also rebuild the rpm from the rpm source, which is much harder than
building from plain source.
> (the rpm is nice since it tries to create the database and tables for me)
The manual explains how to do that ...
>
> I am trying out Bacula because I'm annoyed by the bug/pay ratio on our old
> system and then it is in some ways not flexible enough and certainly not
> leaving a clear impresssion of what it's actually doing.
>
> So I have set up a new cheap sata raid a64 box to do some diskbased backup.
> I like the related chapter in the manual - very instructional and clear.
> But can't help thinking why the diskbased backups are put in tape-like
> files?
Almost identical code is used to read/write both tape and disk files. Less
bugs, zero pay ...
> But it think it will do the job for me anyway - so thank you for a
> well designed system and documentation
Thanks, good luck ...
>
> Steen
>
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
